How we make money
Income today: none. The site carries no advertising, no affiliate links, no sponsored pages and no paid predictions, and nobody has paid for a mention. This page lists each way a site about jackpots could be paid, states whether it is used here, and explains the law that makes the usual route, a link to an operator, one this site will not take.
Possible sources of income
| Source | Used on this site? | Why not |
|---|---|---|
| Affiliate links to operators, paid per sign-up or per deposit | No | A tracked link that leads a reader to a bookmaker promotes participation in a gambling activity, which is the definition of an advertisement in regulation 2 of L.N. 114 of 2026 and needs the Authority's approval under section 87(1) of the Act. The site has no approval and asks for none. |
| Display advertising for operators | No | Same rule. An approved advert must also carry the licence number, a responsible gambling message, the licensee's name and address and the words authorized and regulated by the Gambling Regulatory Authority (L.N. 114 regulation 8(c)); a reader-funded information page is the wrong place for it. |
| Sponsored articles or paid rankings | No | The site publishes no rankings, and paid editorial would make every citation suspect. |
| Paid predictions, tips, subscriptions or a Telegram group | No | The site publishes no picks. Selling them would contradict every page about why a 13-leg result cannot be known. |
| Display advertising unrelated to gambling | No | Not today. It would mean loading an ad network and setting advertising cookies, and the privacy page says neither happens. |
| Selling or sharing reader data | No | No data is collected to sell. There are no accounts or forms, and analytics cookies are set only if you allow them, as the privacy page explains. |
The law behind the absence of operator links
Section 87(1) of the Gambling Control Act, 2025 says that a person shall not, without the approval of the Authority, promote the advertisement of a gambling activity on an electronic medium or any other form of communication. Section 87(4) makes a contravention an offence with a fine of up to KES 20,000,000, imprisonment of up to twenty years, or both. The Gambling Control (Advertising) Regulations, 2026 add the detail: an application for approval is made on Form 1 at least seven days before a campaign starts (regulation 5), an approved advert must carry prescribed content (regulation 8), and it may not contain a call to action, associate gambling with social success, depict it as a source of income or use testimonials (regulation 9). Excise duty of 15 percent is also charged on fees for advertising betting and gaming on the internet and social media under paragraph 8 of Part II of the First Schedule to the Excise Duty Act.
A link that earns the site money when a reader opens an account is, in substance, an advertisement with a call to action. Rather than argue about where the line falls, the site carries no operator link at all. Operators and their domains appear as plain text only where a rule or the regulator's published list makes naming them necessary.
What would happen first if this changed
If the publisher ever decided to earn from the site, four things would happen before any page changed: this page would be rewritten to name the source of income and the terms; the editorial policy would state how that income is kept away from what is written; any gambling advertising would be preceded by the Authority's approval under section 87 and the Advertising Regulations, with the approval reference published here; and the privacy page would be updated first if any tracking were involved. None of those steps has been taken.
What this means for the reader
No page on this site is nudging you towards an operator, a bonus or a subscription, because there is nothing for the site to gain if you bet and nothing to lose if you do not. The arithmetic says a blind 17-leg line wins 1 in 129,140,163 times, and the site has no reason to soften that. Where a page names a licensee, it is because the law or the regulator's list required it, not because anyone paid.